مبانی حقوقی پاسداری از توانمندی موشکی بالستیک جمهوری اسلامی ایران در نظام بین‌الملل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بین‌الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

چکیده

تاریخ، همواره با ظهور فناوری‌های بدیعی که تطورات معنتابهی را در دنیا رقم زده‌اند، کامل شده است. موشک بالستیک دریچه‌ای از قرایح نظامی و سیاسی کشور‌ها را به روی آنان می‌گشاید و بر دامنه قدرت و اقتدار بین‌المللی آنان می‌افزاید. وجه ممیزات موشک‌های بالستیک از بُعد تسلیحاتی نظیر برد، دقت و سرعت شگرف در حمل کلاهک‌های سنگین و همچنین کاربرد غیرتسلیحاتی آن در صنعت فضایی و پرتاب ماهواره، رجحان آن‌را نسبت به سایر پرتابه‌های مشابه رقم زده است. حساسیت دولت‌های متنفذ بین‌المللی بر سر مسأله موشکی، معلول مختصه ممتاز این فناوری در افزایش توان دفاعی و فضایی کشورها است. به همین سبب در میان فقدان هنجارهای لازم‌الاجرای بین‌المللی، مبادرت به تصمیم‌گیری‌های خودسرانه سیاسی و انحصاری کرده‌اند. آنچه در این تحقیق ازنظر گذرانده می‌شود، بایسته‌های حقوقی دفاع و صیانت از موضوع موشکی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در جولانگاه جهانی است. یافته‌های تحقیق مبین آن است که برخلاف ادعا‌های طرح‌شده، فعالیت‌های مشروع و صلح‌آمیز موشکی کشور در سال‌های بعد از انقلاب اسلامی، نمایانگر احراز حق ذاتی ایران در نظام بین‌الملل است که اعزاز آن و به‌رسمیت‌شناختن حق دفاع موشکی، از تعهدات جامعه‌ بین‌المللی در قبال جمهوری اسلامی ایران محسوب می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Legal Basis for Defending the Ballistic Missile Capability of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the International Community

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Aminzadeh 1
  • Amir Lohrasbi 2
1 Associate Professor, College of Law and Political Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2 MA in International Law, College of Law and Political Sciences, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

History has always been complete with the advent of new technologies that have brought about so much change in the world. The ballistic missile opens a window on countries' military and political talents and adds to their scope of international power, and authority. The weapons characteristics of ballistic missiles such as range, accuracy and speed in carrying heavy warheads, as well as its non-weapons use in the space industry and satellite launch, have made it superior to other similar rocket. The sensitivity of the international powers over the missile issue is due to the features of this technology in increasing the defense and space capabilities of countries. For this reason, in the absence of the international enforcement rule, they have resorted to arbitrary political and monopolistic decisions. What is considered in this study is the legal requirements for the defense and protection of the missile issue of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the global arena. The findings of the study indicated that the legitimate and peaceful missile activities of the country over the years show the realization of Iran's inherent right in the international system that respects and recognizes the right to missile defense is one of the obligations of the international community against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • United Nations Security Council
  • Resolution 2231
  • Nuclear warhead
  • launch vehicle
  • Ballistic missile

Smiley face

منابع
فارسی
ساعد، نادر (1386)، «تحلیل هنجارین رژیم کنترل فناوری موشکی و الزامات دفاعی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، مجله سیاست دفاعی، دوره 15، شماره 59، صص 68-43.
عابدینی، عبدالله (1395)، «مقایسه تحریم تسلیحاتی علیه ایران در قطعنامه 2231 و قطعنامه های پیش از آن»، فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، دوره 19، شماره 2، صص 129-107.
انگلیسی
Books
Alder, Murray C. (2012). The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice), Springer.
Brownlie, Ian (2003). Principles of Public International Law, UK, Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Bin (1998). Studies in International Space Law, UK, Clarendon Press.
Chun, Clayton K.S. (2006). Thunder over the Horizon: From V-2 Rockets to Ballistic Missiles (War, Technology, and History), Praeger.
Dixon, Martin, McCorquodale, Robert, Williams, Sarah (2016). Cases & Materials on International Law, Oxford University Press.
Garner, Bryan A. (2009). Black's Law Dictionary, 9th edition, USA, Thomson West Publishing.
Joyner, Daniel H. (2009). International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (Oxford Monographs in International Law), UK, Oxford University Press.
Joyner, Daniel H. (2016). Iran's Nuclear Program and International Law, UK, Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, Hans (2007). General Theory of Law and State, USA, Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
Lepard, Brian D. (2010). Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications (ASIL Studies in International Legal Theory), UK, Cambridge University Press.
Mineiro, Michael (2011). Space Technology Export Controls and International Cooperation in Outer Space, Springer.
NASA (Sounding Rockets Program Office) (1999). NASA Sounding Rocket Program Handbook, Rocket Science Institute.
Pirseyedi, Bobi (2012). Arms Control and Iranian Foreign Policy: Diplomacy of Discontent (Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics), UK, Routledge.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2003). SIPRI Yearbook 2003: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (SIPRI Yearbook Series), Oxford University Press.
Weir, William (2005). 50 Weapons That Changed Warfare, New Page Books.
Articles
Akehurst, Michael (1975). "Custom as a Source of International Law", British Yearbook of International Law, Vol 47, Issue 1, pp. 1–53
Angelova, Anastasia A. (1999). "Compelling Compliance with International Regimes: China and the Missile Technology Control Regime", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 419-450
Elias, Olufemi (2006). "Persistent Objector", Oxford Public International Law(OPIL), Retrieved from: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1455?rskey=bW4XnM&result=1&prd=OPIL
Filho, Jose M. (1994). "The place of the Missile Technology Control Regime(MTCR)in international space law", Space Policy, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 223-228.
Forsberg, C.W. ,Hopper, C.M. , Richter, J.L. , Vantine, H.C. (1998). "Definition of weapons-usable uranium-233", Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Retrieved from: http://web.ornl.gov/info/reports/1998/3445606060721.pdf
Gautier, Philippe (2006). "Non-Binding Agreements", Oxford Public International Law(OPIL), Retrieved from: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1444?prd=OPIL
Gruenberg, Justin (2009). "An Analysis of United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Are All Countries Treated Equally?", Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, Issues 2-3, pp. 469-512
Hurewitz, Barry J. (1994)."Non-Proliferation and Free Access to Outer Space: The Dual-Use Conflict between the Outer Space Treaty and the Missile Technology Control Regime", High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 211-244.
Joyner, Daniel (2015). " Fundamental Rights of States in International Law and the Right to Peaceful Nuclear Energy", Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 661-681
Joyner, Daniel, Roscini, Marco (2015). "Is There Any Room for the Doctrine of Fundamental Rights of States in Today's International Law?", Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 467-481
Kelsen, Hans (1950). "The Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States", The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 259-276
Marmor, Andrei (2019). "Soft Law, Authoritative Advice and Non-Binding Agreements", Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 39, Issue 3, pp. 507-525.
Meyer, Timothy (2009). "Soft Law as Delegation", Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 888-942
Öberg, Marko D. (2006). "The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ", The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, Issue 5, pp. 879-906.
Ozga, Deborah A. (1994). "A Chronology of the Missile Technology Control Regime", The Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 66-93
Rasmussen, Niels Aadal (2007). "Chinese Missile Technology Control – Regime or No Regime?", Danish Institute for International Studies, Retrieved from: https://www.diis.dk/en/research/chinese-missile-technology-control-regime-or-no-regime.
Schwammenthal, Daniel (2018). "Europe, the US and the Iran deal: The need to resolve transatlantic disagreements", European View, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 218-226.
Shaffer, Gregory C. (2010). "Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance", Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, Issue 3, pp. 706-799
Szasz, Paul (2002). " The Security Council Starts Legislating ", American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, Issue 4, pp. 901-904
Tannenwald, Nina (2004). " Law versus Power on the High Frontier: The Case for a Rule-Based Regime for Outer Space", Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 363-422
Turner, Nicholas W. (2014). "The Financial Action Task Force: International Regulatory Convergence through Soft Law ", New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 59, Issue 3, pp. 547-560
Williamson, Richard L. Jr. (2003). "Hard Law, Soft Law, and Non-Law in Multilateral Arms Control: Some Compliance Hypotheses", Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 59-82.
Cases
ICJ Report (1971). Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, Advisory Opinion.
ICJ Report (1986). Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, (Nicaragua v. United States of America).
ICJ Report (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion.
ICJ Report (2003). Oil Platforms, (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America).
Documents
CRS Report (2003). Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and International Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (ICOC): Background and Issues for Congress (CRS Report No. RL31848), Retrieved from Congressional Research Service website: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL31848/3
Defense Intelligence Agency (2019). Iran Military Power Report, Retrieved from Congressional Research Service website: https://www.dia.mil/Portals/27/Documents/News/Military%20Power%20Publications/Iran_Military_Power_LR.pdf
General Assembly Resolution, (1 December 1999), GA/RES/54/54
General Assembly Resolution, (20 November 2000), GA/RES/55/33
IAEA reports (3 March 2020). Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 2231 (2015), (GOV/2020/5)
Report of The Secretary-General, (23 July 2002). The issue of missiles in all its aspects, A/57/229
S/PV.6335, (9 June 2010)
Security Council Resolution, (20 July 2015). Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) on the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear programme, (S/RES/2231)
Security Council Resolution, (9 June 2010), S/RES/1929
Security Council, (11 June 2020). Implementation of Security Council resolution 2231 (2015), (S/2020/531)
Security Council, (12 July 2016). Report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of Security Council resolution 2231 (2015), (S/2016/589)
Security Council, (18 August 2017). Letter dated 17 August 2017 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, (S/2017/719)
Security Council, (20 May 2020). Letter dated 20 May 2020 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, (S/2020/428)
Security Council, (27 November 2019). Letter dated 21 November 2019 from the Permanent Representatives of France, Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, (S/2019/911)
Security Council, (28 November 2018). Letter dated 20 November 2018 from the Permanent Representatives of France, Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council, (S/2018/1062)
Security Council, (4 December 2019). Letter dated 4 December 2019 from the Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, (S/2019/926)
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (January 1967), Entry into force: October 1967.
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (1 July 1968), Entry into force: 5 March 1970
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969), Entry into force: 27 January 1980
Sites
Berger, Miriam (2020). Where U.S. troops are in the Middle East and Afghanistan, visualized: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/where-us-troops-are-in-the-middle-east-and-could-now-be-a-target-visualized/2020/01/04/1a6233ee-2f3c-11ea-9b60-817cc18cf173_story.html, Last Visit: 4/2020
GUIDELINES FOR SENSITIVE MISSILE-RELEVANT TRANSFERS: https://mtcr.info/guidelines-for-sensitive-missile-relevant-transfers/; Last Visit: 5/2020
Haas, Lawrence J. (2017). Defending the Indefensible: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/world-report/articles/2017-10-03/john-kerrys-defense-of-the-iran-nuclear-deal-is-pathetic, Last Visit: 4/2020
Hurd, Hilary (2019). Do Iran's New Space Launchers Violate International Law: https://www.lawfareblog.com/do-irans-new-space-launchers-violate-international-law; Last Visit: 6/2020
IFP (2017). Why Iran’s Missile Tests Don’t Violate UNSC Resolution 2231: https://ifpnews.com/irans-missile-test-dont-violate-unsc; Last Visit: 6/2020
Sanger, David E., Jakes, Lara (2020). Iran Is Accused of Hiding Suspected Nuclear Activity: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/19/us/politics/iran-nuclear-iaea.html?searchResultPosition=3; Last Visit: 7/2020
TEXT OF THE HCoC: https://www.hcoc.at/?tab=what_is_hcoc&page=text_of_the_hcoc; Last Visit: 7/2020
URANIUM ENRICHMENT: https://tutorials.nti.org/nuclear-101/uranium-enrichment/ ; Last Visit: 4/2020
 
دوره 14، شماره 51 - شماره پیاپی 51
فصلنامه تابستان
شهریور 1400
صفحه 151-176
  • تاریخ دریافت: 18 مهر 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 شهریور 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 01 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 شهریور 1400