Jurisprudential and historical evidence indicates that the Holy Prophet of Islam, may God bless him and grant him peace, and the Commander of the Faithful, may God bless him and grant him peace, faced a range of internal subversives. These people have been trying to weaken the political system and harm those dignitaries in the form of soft and hard subversive measures. Although the Prophetic and Alevi way of dealing with soft subversives is the same; But in the face of the hard subversives, Amir al-Mu'minin peace be upon him took up arms with the spectrum of subversives who were taking armed action; However, this type of action has not been reported by the Holy Prophet of Islam. The present article has paid attention to the philosophy and why of the distinction between these two ways. Based on this, he has tried to show with a descriptive and analytical method that the hypocrites of the time of the Prophet of Islam, peace and blessings of God be upon him, never had the courage to reveal their subversive actions. And now, Amir al-Mu'minin, peace be upon him, was faced with a range of hypocrites who openly and openly took armed action against him and his political rule. Therefore, the distinction between two ways is not due to two different policies in the same conditions. In addition, considering the extension of the political guardianship of the Infallible (peace be upon him) and its exemplary application to the comprehensive jurisprudence, the life of Amir al-Mu'minin (peace be upon him) in the face of soft and hard subversives in the age of occultation will also be followed and enforced.
)
