the methodology of intelligence analysis: between intuitive perception and systematic processing 2

Document Type : Original Article

Author

imam khomeini university

Abstract

Choosing the appropriate epistemic device to understand the phenomena of the world is usually one of the concerns of methodologists and experts in research methods. The subject matter of this article is the long-standing competition between intuitive perception, which means immediate understanding, on the one hand, and systematic rational perception, on the other hand. In the field of information analysis, the spread of this dispute has been manifested as a competition between two analytical schools or radiams (analyzing Shahidi information and structured information analysis) and has appropriated the research literature in the field of study. Knowledge from other fields of science, in an effort to become professional and scientific, led courses with systematic processing training, then with the peak of cognitive research about intuitive knowledge, he witnessed the spread of deep thinking information in this field and finally, Towards. Full and intelligent utilization has moved from two paradigms.

Keywords

Smiley face

References

اسپلمن، باربارا. "استدلال فردی". باروخ فیس­هات و چری چاوین. تحلیل اطلاعاتی:بنیان­های علمی رفتاری و اجتماعی. تهران: دانشکده اطلاعات، 1394. 183-222.
اسرائیل،بن اسحاق. "فراگرد تخمین در سیاست و اطلاعات". مهدی سلطانی. فراگرد تخمین در سیاست و اطلاعات. تهران: فرهنگ گفتمان، 1381. 6-95.
جفری فریدمن و ریچارد خاوسر. "ارزیابی عدم قطعیت در اطلاعات". در تحلیل اطلاعات و سیاستگزاری خارجی. تهران: انتشارات دیده­بان، 1398. 61-72.
ریچارد هیوئر و فرسون. تحلیل ساختارمند؛ روش­های مقدماتی تحلیل اطلاعات.ترجمه علیخانی. تهرا: دانشکده اطلاعات، 1393.
شیروانی،علی."مفهوم شهود در فلسفه غرب و نسبت آن با علم حضوری". فصلنامه آیین حکمت، سال دوم، شماره 6(زمستان 1389). 65-110.
جیمز کادوس و هال آرکس. "تئوری­های شهودی رفتار". باروخ فیس­هات و چری چاوین. تحلیل اطلاعاتی؛ بنیان­های علمی رفتاری و اجتماعی. تهران: دانشکده اطلاعات، 1394. 223-261.
مارین،استفن. "تحلیل اطلاعات علم است یا هنر". معاونت پژوهش. تحلیل اطلاعات و حوزه­های پیرامونی. تهران: دانشکده اطلاعات، 1394.73-97.
هندریکسون،نوئل."تفکر انتقادی در تحلیل اطلاعات". در تحلیل اطلاعات و سیاستگزاری خارجی. تهران: انتشارات دیده­بان، 1398.73-89.
هیوِئر، ریچارد. دشمن چگونه می اندیشد: روانشناسی تحلیل اطلاعات. تهران: دانشکده فرماندهی و ستاد، 1381.
Bone, Stive. Intuitive and analytical thinking in technology management. Cambridge: NU Angle White Paper, 2002.
borg, lars. "improving intelligence snslysis:harnessing intuition and reducing biases by mesns of structured analysis." the international journal of intelligence,security , and public affairs 19, no. 1 (2017): 2-22.
Edward Russo & Paul Shoemaker. Decision Trap: The Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision-Making and How to Overcome Them. NewYork: Rockfefeller Center, 1989.
Finley, James. "Nobody Likes to be Surprised: Intelligence Failures." Military Intelligence Bulletin, March 1994: 38-52.
Folker, R. Intelligence analysis in theater joint intelligence centers: An expriment in applying structured methods. Washington. DC: Joint Military Intelligence, 2000.
Gourley, Robert. "Intuitive Intelligence." Defense Intelligence Journal, 1997.
Hogarth, Robin. "Heuristic and Linear Models of Judgment: Matching Rules and Enviornments." Psychological Review 114, no. 3 (2007): 733-758.
mandel, david. "can decision sciences improve intelligence analysis." In researching national security intelligence: multidisciplinary approaches, by stephen coulthart . washington: georgtown university press, 2019.
Rorty, Richard. Intuition. Vol. 4, in The encyclopedia Of Philosophy, by Paul Edward, 204-212. NewYork: MacMillan publishing, 1979.
Seymour Epstein & Rosemary Pacini. "Some Basic Issues Regarding Dual-process Theories From the Perspective of Cognitive Expriential Self-Theory." In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, by Shelly Chaiken & Yaacov Trope, 462-482. NewYork: The Guilford Press, 1999.
WASTELL, COLIN A. "Cognitive Predispositions and Intelligence Analyst Reasoning." International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, no. 23 (2010): 449-460.
whitesmith, martha. cognitive bias in intelligence analysis: testing the analysis of competing hypothesis method. edinburgh: edinburgh university press, 2020.
Security Horizons
Volume 15, Issue 56 - Serial Number 56
Autumn Quarterly
March 2023
Pages 161-180

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 14 March 2023
  • Publish Date: 22 November 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics