Nuclear Diplomacies of Iran and Europe and Their Impact on International Security: Emphasis on US Withdrawal from Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate professor of The Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. Allameh Tabatabaei University

2 PhD candidate of international relations, Allameh Tabatabaei University

Abstract

The policies of the United States and Europe had been based on making security challenges up the acheivement of the G + 1 countries to the Geneva, Lausanne and Vienna agreements. The main reason for such challenges related to the changes in the regional power balance, and the opposition of influential actors in the global policies against Iran's behavioral patterns. The US followed coercive diplomacy as its strategic action model in case of Comprehensive Action Program to restrict Iran's strategic capabilities. The crisis management processes in Iran's relationship with the 5 + 1 countries are based on indications from nuclear diplomacy. The US strategic goals could not be achieved through this process. Donald Trump’s withdrawal from JCPOA designated such a situation. Given this situation and based on the geopolitical security concerns posed by Iran’s missile power and the geographic proximity of European countries to Iran can be considered as the main cause of the persistence of European countries on the continuation of JCPOA. This study investigates the relationship between Iran's nuclear diplomacy and that of Europe, and the study of the causes and consequences of the continuation of Europe's remaining after US withdrawal. The research question involves the influence of the nuclear diplomacy and Europe in international politics and security. The research hypothesizes that the nuclear diplomacy has intensified contradictions between Iran and the United States relating international politics. Aggressive neo-realism is used in this paper as an approach emphasizing on diplomacy and negotiation as the main axis for global peace. This research is carried out based on qualitative method.

Keywords


ـ احدیان، محمدسعید (1394)، برجام در تحلیل کلان و خرد، مشهد: موسسه فرهنگی هنری خراسان. 
ـ انتصار، نادر و افراسیابی، کاوه (1395)، ماراتن مذاکرات هسته‌ای، ترجمه سعید جعفری و روح‌الله فقیهی، تهران: نشر قومس.
ـ دلاورپور اقدم، مصطفی (1387)، ایران هسته‌ای نمادی در برابر نظام هژمونیک، تهران: دفتر مطالعات سیاسی.
ـ پربن، دومینیکن و دوگل، لویی (1397)، خروج ایالات متحده از توافقنامه وین پیرامون برنامه هسته‌ای ایران: یک وضعیت حقوقی متناقض، فرانسه: گزارش انجمن حقوقدانان کمیسیون مسائل ایران، تحلیلهای حقوقی.
ـ پورسعید، فرزاد (1395)، منطق و معیار ارزیابی برجام، تهران: برجام، سیاستها، دستاوردها و الزامات، مرکز بررسی‌های استراتژیک ریاست جمهوری و مرکز مطالعات راهبردی.
ـ روحانی، حسن (1390)، دیپلماسی هسته‌ای و امنیت ملی، تهران: انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک مجمع تشخیص مصلحت نظام.
ـ مجیدزاده، رضا (1397)، چشم‌انداز سازوکار ویژه مالی اروپا، قابل دسترس در:
http://www.scfr.ir
ـ حسینی، دیاکو و موسویان، سیدحسین (1395)، منطق پیامدهای مطلوب و نامطلوب برجام، تهران: برجام، سیاستها، دستاوردها و الزامات، مرکز بررسی های استراتژیک ریاست جمهوری و مرکز مطالعات راهبردی.
ـ عسگری ده‌آبادی، محمد مهدی (1397)، خروج امریکا از برجام و تبعات آن برای ایران، تهران: گزارش شرکت سبدگردان الگوریتم.
ـ عسگری، یدالله (1385)، بررسی و تحلیل حقوقی عملکرد آژانس بین المللی انرژی اتمی در مسئله فعالیت های هسته ای ایران، تهران: فصلنامه سیاست دفاعی، سال 14، شماره 55.
ـ قادری کنگاوری، روح الله (1397)، ایرگزیت؛ فرجام یک برجام، قابل دسترس در:
rahbordemoaser.ir/fa/news/2045
- Abrams, Elliot (2012a), “What Does it Take for Obama to move on Syria?”, National Review, May 31.
- Abrams, Elliot (2012b), “Processing Delay”, Foreign Policy, June 8.
- Adib Moghaddam, Arshin and Abbas Maleki (2012), “Would a nuclear Iran Cause another Itolocaust?”, www.VeteranStoday.com/2012/04/30/Iran-netanyahu-and-the-ho..., April 30.
-  Afrasiabi, Kaeve, (2010), “Post-Modernism and Iran’s Nuclear Program”, Iran Review, Octobr 21.
- Afrasiabi, Kaveh, (2014), “Reflections on Robert Einhorn’s Letter to Iran”, Iran Review, August 21, available at: http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Reflections-on-Robert-Einhorn-s-Open-Letter-to-Iran.htm.
- Ajami, Fouad (2012a), “The Syrian Rebellion”, www.hoover.org/publication/defining-ideas/article/118361, May 31.
- Alfoneh, Ali, Mehrzad Boroujerdi, Mehdi Khalaji, Karim Sadjadpour (2012), "the Battle for Power in Iran", Washington, D. C, Carnegie Foundation, Friday, February 24.
- Ajami, Fouad (2012a), “The Syrian Rebellion”, www.hoover.org/publication/defining-ideas/article/118361, May 31.
- Ajami, Fouad (2012b),“Egypt’s, Next leader Won’t Be A Creature of Tahrir Square", Wall street journal, May 26.
- Albright, David (2012)Iran Talks: What Should Be On the Table?Washington: Council on Foreign Relations, March.
- Bastani, Hosseing, (2014), “How Powerful Is Rouhani in the Islamic Republic?”, Chatham House Research Paper, November.
- Bolton, John (2012) Israel is not the Threat, Mr.Obama. Iran Is, Christian Science Monitor, April 03.
- Brands, Hal (2006), “Rethinking Nonproliferation: LBJ, the Gilpatric Committee and U.S National Security Policy”, Journal of Cold War Studies, No. 8, Vol. 2, pp. 83-112.
- Byman, Daniel (2011), "The Arab Awakening America and the Transformation of the Middle East", Washington: Brookings Institute, February.
- Cherkaoui, Mohammed, (2016) “Trump’s Withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal: Security or Economics? ”, Al Jazeera Centre for Studies   10  May 2018.
- Clapper, James (2012) Greatest Threats: Iran Threat: Attack to United States?, abc news, January31.
- Clawson, Patrick (2012), "Sanctions Are Only a Stop-Gap", Foreign Affairs, May 9.
- Clement, Scott (2012), "The New, New World order", Foreign Policy, April 26.
- Elman, Colin (2007), Realism, in Martin Griffiths, ed. International Relations Theory for the Twenty First Century, London: Routledge.
- Entessar, N., (2009), “Iran’s Nuclear Decision Making Calculus”, Middle East policy, Vol. 16, No. 2.
- Halevay, Efraim (2015), “Obama was right, Iran capitulated”, Y net news, April 6.
- Hicks, Kathleen & Melissa Dalton, (2017), “Deterring Iran after the Nuclear Deal”, Washington: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
- Johnson, Loch, (2011), The Threat on the Horizon: An Inside Account of America’s Search for Security after the Cold War, New York: Oxford University Press. p 165.
- Joyner, Daniel, (2016), “Iran’s Nuclear Program and International Law; From Confrontation to Accord”, London: Oxford University Press.
- Karami, Arash, (2014), “IRGC Denies Negotiation Are Source of Iran’s Security, “Almonitor, December 4.
- Kissinger, Henry and George Shultz (2015), “The Iran Deal and its Consequences”, Wall Street Journal, April 7.
- Pollack, Kenneth (2013), “Unthinkable: Iran, the Bomb and American Strategy”, New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Roshandel, Jalil, (2000), “Iran’s Foreign and Security Policies: How the Decisionmaking Process Evolves”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 31, no. 1, March. pp. 105-17.
- Tropf, Andrew, (2014), “Did the Saudis and the US Collude In Dropping the Oil Prices?” Oil Price.com, December 32.
- Varasteh, Mansour, (2013), “Understanding Iran’s National Security Doctrine”, Leicester, UK: Troubador Publishing Ltd.
- Waltz, Kenneth (2012), “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 4, July/August.
- Walt, Stephen (2009), https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/03/19/a-realistic-approach-to-irans-nuclear-program/
-      http://eeas.europa.eu – 29/05/2018 . iran deal: eu  united on keeping iran nuclear deal in place for European security
-      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-european-army-france-russia-us-military-defence-eu-a8619721.html
-      https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/press-briefing-national-security-advisor-john-bolton-iran/