The Role of the International Court of Justice in Strengthening and Ensuring the Security of Borders

Author

Ph.D. in International Law and Instructor of Islamic Azad University of Shoushtar Branch (Corresponding Author)

Abstract

The issue of security is one of the things that its importance and function on the borders of the countries is undeniable. The emergence of territorial and border disputes between countries can jeopardize the security of the borders between them and even the international order and security of the international community, and this role will become more pronounced when this conflict results in armed conflict. In the meantime, resolving territorial and border disputes between states can help maintain, restore and guarantee order and security at the borders and in the international community. In this study we seek to explain the role of the Tribunal in resolving territorial and border disputes between states in the way of preservation, restoration and reconciliation with the International Court of Justice, which has led to an armed conflict between the parties. Ensure border security. This research is fundamental in purpose and methodological in nature. The present study has been conducted using library resources, the Internet, articles, Latin and Farsi studies, and the study of cases by the International Court of Justice in the field of territorial and border disputes between countries. The method of gathering information was through cross-examination by reviewing the files of the International Court of Justice. Whatever the source of the disagreement, the occurrence of territorial and border disputes between countries, especially if it results in armed conflict, disrupts and negatively affects the order and security of the borders. The International Court of Justice deals with the settlement of territorial and border disputes between States, with the available legal remedies and the exercise of its powers. In this direction, the Divine Hierarchy: 1. The principle of respect and stability of border treaties; 2. The principle of legal separation; 3. The principle of effective domination; Takes steps to ensure the stability of borders. The principle of stability is the cornerstone of the contemporary system of international law, and borders need security as a starting point for relations between the states that are the main constituents of this system. The International Court of Justice, as an impartial, independent and efficient judicial authority, uses all available means of resolving territorial and border disputes (as a threat to border security). By focusing on the principle of stability, the Court is taking steps to ensure the security of borders and the international community as a whole.

Keywords

References

- Alshaikh, Abdullatif A. (2001), Saudi Arabia and It's [Persian] Gulf Cooperation Council Neighbours: a Study in International Boundary Management, Ph.D Thesis, University of Durham, Department of Geography, UK.
- Bakhashab, Omar Abubakar  (1996), “The Legal Concept of International Boundary”, JKAU: Ecom & Adm, Vol. 9
- Blake, Gerald (1994), "Note on the International Court of Justice Rulling on the chad- Libya Dispute", Boundary & Security Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 1.
- Brownlie, Ian (2009), "The Wang Tieya Lecture in Public International Law, The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes", Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol.8, No.2
- Buss, Andreas (2010), "The Preah Vihear Case and Regional Customary Law", Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, Issue.1.
- Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso / Republic of Mali), Judgment of 22 December 1986.
- Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, (Cameroon V. Nigeria), Judgment of 10 October 2002.
- Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear, (Cambodia V. Thailand), Judgment of 15 June 1962.
- Case Concerning the Territorial Dispute, (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya / Chad), Judgment of 3 February 1994.
- Coulibaly, Issa (2013), "Demarcating Africa's Post Conflict Boundaries: The Burkina Faso – Mali Experience", Cited in Delimitation and Demarcation of  Boundaries in Africa, African Union Border Programme (AUBP), Adis Ababa.
- Daniel, Tim, Perry, Alan, (2008), The Language of International Boundary Disputes, Edwards Angel Palmer & Dodge.
- Dickson Gravens, William Samuel (1998), "The Future of Islamic Legal Arguments in International Boundary Dispute between Islamic States", Washington and Lee law Review, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, Article. 6.
- Distefano, Giovanni (2006), "The Conceptualization (Construction) of Territorial Title in the Light of the International Court of Justice Case Law", Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 19
- Goertz, Gary, Diehl, Paul F. (2002), Territorial Changes and International Conflicts, Studies in International Conflict, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
- Grant, Thomas D. (2015), Aggression Against Ukraine: Territory Responsibility and International Law, First Edition, Plagrave Macmillan, United States.
- Jibril, Nejib (2003), "The Binding Dilemma: From Bakassi to Badme – Making States Comply with Territorial Decisions of International Judicial Bodies", American University International Law Review, Vol. 19, No.3
- Johanson, M.C. (2004), Self Determination and Borders: The Obligation to Show Consideration for the Interests of Others, Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi University Press.
- Kaikobad, Kaiyan Homi (2007), Interpretation and Revision of International Boundary Disputes, Cambridge University Press.
- Le Febvre, Rebecca  K. (2014), Interests and Identities in Peace Negotiations: Nigeria, Cameroon and the Bakassi Peninsula", African Social Science Review, Vol. 6, No.1, Article. 6.
- Merrills, J.G, (2011), International Dispute Settlement, Fifth Edition, Cambridge University Press.
- Naldi, Gino J. (1987), "Case Concerning the Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/ Republic of Mali): uti Possidetis in an African Perspective", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 39, Issue. 4.
- Okumu, Wafula (2013), "The Purpose and Functions of International Boundaries: With Specific Reference to Africa", Cited in Delimitation and Demarcation of Boundaries in Africa, African union Border Programme (AUBP), Adis Ababa.
- Prescott, Victor (1996), "Contributions of the United Nations to Solving Boundary and Territorial Disputes, 1945-1995", Political Geography, Vol. 15, No. 3/4.
Prescott, Victor, Triggs, Gillian. D, (2008), International Frontiers and Boundaries, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Boston
- Shaw, Malcolm N. (2003), International Law, Fifth Edition, Cambridge University Press.
- Tanaka, Yoshifumi (2012), "A New Pahse of the Temple of Preah Vihear Dispute before the International Court of Justice: Reflection on the Indication of Provisional Measures of 18 July 2011”, Chinese Journal of International Law, Vol. 11, No.1
- Udombana, Nsongurua J. (2004), "The Ghost of Berlin Still Haunts Africa! The ICJ Judgment on the Land and Maritime Boundary Dispute between Cameroon and Nigeria", African Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 10.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 May 2018
  • Revise Date: 13 January 2019
  • Accept Date: 19 September 2018
  • Publish Date: 22 May 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics